Saturday, December 3, 2022

Congress Declines to Extend Families First Coronavirus Act Mandate

On December 27, 2020, President Donald Trump signed a second stimulus package addressing the economy and the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the many issues resolved in the new stimulus package, Congress didn’t extend the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) leave mandate, so employers were no longer required to provide leave under the FFCRA starting January 1, 2021, but Congress did extend the tax credits available to employers who voluntarily provide FFCRA leave.

As previously reported, the FFCRA required employers with fewer than 500 employees to provide emergency paid sick leave (EPSL) and paid expanded FMLA (E-FMLA) to employees for certain COVID-19-related reasons, subject to monetary caps. Employers then could claim payroll tax credits in an amount equal to what they paid employees for leave under the FFCRA. When enacted, the FFCRA was set to expire on December 31, 2020.

Tax Credit

Even though the leave mandate ended on December 31, 2020, the tax credits are still available to employers who voluntarily provide leave under the FFCRA, if the employers follow the rules, such as providing leave only for an FFCRA-eligible reason and paying employees at the rates specified under the FFCRA. The tax credits are available until March 31, 2021.

Although the stimulus package provided a concrete answer about the future of the FFCRA, it did leave open some questions that may need to be answered with agency guidance.

For example, if an employer’s 12-month period for FMLA calculations resets on January 1, 2021, can an employer claim tax credits for voluntarily providing further E-FMLA leave to an employee who previously exhausted their 12-week entitlement?

Check for Updates

Employers should continue to frequently check the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and IRS guidance webpages related to the FFCRA for updated guidance following the enactment of the stimulus bill.

In California, the FFCRA’s fate held more importance because California’s COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave program was tied to the FFCRA’s expiration.

As previously reported, the California Legislature enacted AB 1867, which mandated employers with 500 or more employees to provide up to two weeks of supplemental paid sick leave for certain qualifying reasons. AB 1867 expressly provided that the supplemental paid sick leave program expires when the FFCRA does.

Because Congress didn’t extend the FFCRA mandate, the California Labor Commissioner updated the AB 1867 guidance to reflect that California’s COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave program has now also expired. However, the state Legislature will soon reconvene and may enact new leave policies related to COVID-19, so employers should continue to monitor developments in California.

Local Ordinances

Finally, employers still need to be aware of the many local city and county ordinances enacted in 2020 that provided supplemental COVID-19 paid sick leave with their own rules and expiration dates unrelated to state or federal law.

CalChamber members can learn about local COVID-19-related ordinances that may apply to them using the Local Ordinances Wizard. Not a member? See how CalChamber can help you.

Staff Contact: Matthew J. Roberts

Matthew Roberts
Matthew Roberts
Matthew J. Roberts joined the CalChamber in July 2019 as an employment law counsel/subject matter expert. He explains California and federal labor and employment laws to CalChamber members and customers, and was named in October 2021 to serve as manager of the Labor Law Helpline. He came to the CalChamber from the Shaw Law Group, P.C. of Sacramento, where he was a senior attorney, authored articles on emerging issues in employment law, and represented employers before state/federal employment law agencies. He received a B.A. in government from California State University, Sacramento and holds a J.D. from McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific, where he also served on the McGeorge Law Review as both a writer and primary managing editor. See full bio

Related Articles

Cal/OSHA Considers Removing Exclusion Pay Mandate from New COVID Rule

As the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) prepares to vote on the next iteration of California’s COVID-19 emergency regulation, one important change being considered is whether to extend California employers’ obligation...

COVID-19 Regulation: Cal/OSHA Makes Big Changes Ahead of December Vote

California employers may want to get out their measuring tape — because the size (in cubic feet) of a workspace just became an important element of COVID-19 compliance. Last Thursday and Friday (October 13–14), the...

CalChamber Calls for Changes to Nonemergency COVID Draft Rule

The Cal/OSHA Standards Board’s draft proposal to extend the state’s COVID-19 regulation for another two years — with some significant changes from the COVID-19 emergency regulation — still needs adjustments, the California Chamber of...