Monday, November 28, 2022

Warnings to Employee with Bad Attitude Should Focus on Specifics

We would like to terminate an employee who has a bad attitude that rubs off on other employees. However, we haven’t given him any warning. Is it safe to let him go?

Although California is at “at-will” state, meaning employment may be terminated by either the employer or employee on notice to the other, that doesn’t make an employer bulletproof when relying on its at-will status.

At-Will Limits

First, at-will can be negated in a number of ways, including, but not limited to, contracts to terminate only for cause, promises of progressive discipline, and promises that “you will always have a job if you do good work.”

But even absent the circumstances noted above, an employer can’t terminate an employee based on his/her status in a protected category, such as age, physical disability, race, etc.

Therefore, when considering termination for someone who has a “bad attitude,” be sure to keep in mind all these protected categories.

For example, if the employee with the bad attitude is in one or more protected categories and no warnings have been issued, that employee may easily claim discrimination upon termination. Therefore, an employer should follow progressive discipline, but never promise it.

Most employees expect there to be some kind of reason for getting fired, and if they haven’t received any warnings at all and the employer simply states that the employee isn’t working out, the vague language doesn’t bode well for the employer.

Focus on Specifics

Therefore, even when it’s difficult, the employer should give warnings with specifics to the employee.

The bad attitude can affect the workplace in a number of ways, and that impact should be the focus of the warnings.

Issues such as stress/unhappiness of co-workers, disruption of work flow—the employer should address these so that if a termination for a “bad attitude” is challenged, the employer has ample defenses.


Column based on questions asked by callers on the Labor Law Helpline, a service to California Chamber of Commerce preferred and executive members. For expert explanations of labor laws and Cal/OSHA regulations, not legal counsel for specific situations, call (800) 348-2262 or submit your question at www.hrcalifornia.com.

Staff Contact: Dana Leisinger

Dana Leisinger
Dana Leisinger
Dana Leisinger joined the CalChamber in 2000 and currently serves as an HR adviser. She has advised employers on matters such as employment law, wrongful termination, discrimination, sexual harassment and wage and hour issues. She also has conducted seminars and training and guided employers through various levels of governmental investigations. Leisinger holds a J.D. from the McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific.

Related Articles

Employee Arrested While Off Duty? Proceed Cautiously; Gather Facts

One of our employees did not show up for work yesterday and failed to call or otherwise notify us of his absence. We have a no-call/no-show/no-job policy. Another employee told us that the missing...

Moonlighting OK, But Not Job Performance/Attendance Issues

Can California employers require employees to submit written notification/disclosure that they have a second job? California is very protective of employees who engage in “lawful conduct,” and it is illegal to discriminate against employees or...

Job Killer Rehiring/Retention Mandate Moves in Senate

A California Chamber of Commerce-opposed job killer bill that will unnecessarily slow the ability of certain businesses to reopen following a state of emergency passed a Senate policy committee this week. AB 3216 (Kalra; D-San...