How to Respond to Federal Request for Documents Related to Form I-9s

Matthew Roberts

We received a Notice of Inspection from the federal government requesting documents related to our Form I-9s and other business documents. How do we respond to this notice?

All employers must comply with the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) by verifying that a new hire is eligible to work in the United States. Employers must use the Form I-9 to comply with this requirement.

To ensure that employers are complying with the ICRA, the federal government is authorized to conduct an administration inspection process. Although a few federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of Justice may investigate employer IRCA compliance, a Notice of Inspection (NOI) usually will come from Homeland Security Investigations within the Department of Homeland Security.

Receiving an Inspection Notice

Employers that receive an NOI will have at least three business days’ notice to prepare the production of all documents that are requested. The NOI may request documents such as payroll records, active and inactive employee lists, business license and other records in addition to the Form I-9 records.

In addition to the federal NOI response, California law requires employers to provide additional notice to their own employees.

California employers must post a notice to all current employees within 72 hours of receiving the NOI. The notice must be posted in the same language that is normally used to communicate employment-related information and must include:

  • The name of the immigration agency conducting the inspection;
  • The date the employer received the NOI;
  • The nature of the inspection, if known; and
  • A copy of the NOI.

If the employees have a collective bargaining representative, this notice must go to that representative as well.

Responding to Inspection Results

Once the federal agency has received and reviewed the documents, it will issue its investigative findings in writing. The several possible outcomes include, but are not limited to: a letter of full compliance, a notice of technical or procedural failures in the Forms I-9 and a notice of “suspect documents” — that the documents reviewed may not relate to the employee or establish the employee’s eligibility to work in the United States.

Once the inspection results are received, employers need to prepare any potential response and take actions as required based on the results. Additionally, under California law, the employer must provide a notice to any “affected employees” identified by the inspection results as potentially lacking work authorization or having other document deficiencies.

The notice must be provided directly to each affected employee — and any collective bargaining representative — within 72 hours of receiving the inspection results and must include:

  • A copy of the written immigration agency notice informing the employer of the inspection results; and
  • A written notice of the employer’s and affected employee’s obligations arising from the inspection which contains:
    • A description of the deficiencies or other issues directly relating to the affected employee;
    • The timeframe for correcting the issues;
    • The date and time of any meetings with the employer to correct the issues; and
    • The employee’s right to representation during any meeting with the employer.

Conducting Audits

To help mitigate against inspection issues, employers should conduct regular internal Form I-9 audits to ensure ongoing compliance and to correct any errors before an inspection notice is received.

When conducting an audit, ensure that the methods for the audit selection criteria don’t appear to be discriminatory or retaliatory. For example, selecting for review only employees without U.S. citizenship documentation could result in an immigration-related discrimination claim.

Employers should discuss with legal counsel any questions about conducting Form I-9 audits and responding to NOIs.


Column based on questions asked by callers on the Labor Law Helpline, a service to California Chamber of Commerce preferred members and above. For expert explanations of labor laws and Cal/OSHA regulations, not legal counsel for specific situations, call (800) 348-2262 or submit your question at www.hrcalifornia.com.

Matthew Roberts
Matthew Roberts
Matthew J. Roberts, a member of the CalChamber legal affairs team since July 2019, was named associate general counsel, labor and employment in October 2023. He explains California and federal labor and employment laws to CalChamber members and customers, and since October 2021 has served as manager of the Labor Law Helpline. Roberts brought to CalChamber a decade of experience representing business owners on California wage and hour and anti-discrimination employment laws for law firms in Sacramento and Davis. He received a B.A. in government from California State University, Sacramento and holds a J.D. from McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific, where he also served on the McGeorge Law Review as both a writer and primary managing editor. See full bio

Related Articles

Using REAL ID vs. NonREAL ID for Form I-9 Documentation

A new hire provided their nonREAL ID driver license for their Form I-9 documentation. Can I use this to satisfy the I-9 documentation requirement? Yes. See the discussion below. REAL ID Status Congress passed the REAL ID...

How to Decide When to Keep Record in Personnel File or Store It Apart

For California employers, what should go in an employee’s personnel file, and what should be stored separately? In California, the law doesn’t give employers a single “required contents” checklist for a personnel file. Labor Code...

Consul General Explains Mexico’s Reaction to Changed Approach of US Trade Policy

The changed paradigm of U.S.-Mexico relations and the implications for both trading partners was the focus of the recent breakfast meeting of the CalChamber Council for International Trade. The featured speaker at the Sept. 19...