Saturday, November 26, 2022

Industry Opposition Causes Agency to Restart Prop. 65 Warning Proposal

A regulatory proposal to upend how businesses present Proposition 65 warnings has been dropped by the state agency in charge so it can come back with a new version reflecting comments on the previous proposed rule.

The California Chamber of Commerce and the Consumer Brands Association (CBA) led an industry coalition of 119 organizations that pushed back against the warning changes proposed by the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).

The coalition argued that OEHHA’s proposal to change short-form Proposition 65 warnings a mere two years after the agency overhauled the warning regulations would generate increased cost and unnecessary liability for business and yet still fail to address the Proposition 65 overwarning problem — something the agency intended to fix with the rulemaking.

On May 20, OEHHA published a notice that it will not move forward with the proposed rule it had been working on. Instead, OEHHA said it intends to restart the rulemaking process in the next several weeks with a proposal “informed by” the comments it had received on its previous proposal.

Response to Comments

The previous proposal included notable modifications that appeared to have been made in direct response to CalChamber and CBA industry coalition comments. Among those modifications were:

• An increase in the maximum label size of the short-form warning and acknowledgment of label space limitations on some consumer products.

• Preserving the ability to use on websites or in catalogs the same short-form warnings found on the products.

The CalChamber and coalition will be ready to continue the effort to make sure new warning requirements provide greater certainty and confidence to businesses while helping consumers make informed choices when buying products.

Read more about the coalition’s successful opposition to OEHHA’s previous proposal.

Staff Contact: Adam Regele

Adam Regele
Adam Regele
Adam Regele joined the CalChamber in April 2018 as a policy advocate specializing in environmental policy, housing and land use, and product regulation issues. He was named a senior policy advocate in April 2021 in recognition of his efforts on behalf of members. Regele came to CalChamber after practicing law at Oakland-based Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, PLC, where he advised private and public clients on complex projects involving land use and environmental laws and regulations at the local, state and federal levels. Before entering private practice, Regele served as a federal judicial law clerk to the Honorable Edward J. Davila of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Regele earned a B.S. in environmental science at the University of California, Berkeley, and a J.D. from UC Hastings College of Law, where he was symposium editor and research and development editor for the Hastings West-Northwest Journal.

Related Articles

Appeals Court Sides with CalChamber in Prop. 65 Ruling on Acrylamide in Food

Last week, California businesses won another victory in the continuing debate over whether the Proposition 65 warning requirement applies to acrylamide in food and beverage products. In a March 17 ruling, the Ninth Circuit U.S....

CalChamber, Coalition Gain Some Changes to Flawed Prop. 65 Warning Rulemaking

A year ago, on January 8, 2021, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) proposed changes to how businesses warn under Proposition 65. A February 2021 CalChamber article explained why the agency’s proposal to...

Prop. 65 Virtual Conference to Explore Warning Rules, Acrylamide

Proposition 65 warning rules, acrylamide in food, and small business compliance challenges are among the topics to be discussed at the virtual Prop. 65 Clearinghouse Conference on September 27. Panel discussions for all attendees will...