Thursday, December 1, 2022

Religious Wear at Work: Interactive Dialogue Best When Questions Arise

LeisingerDana2015Our employee wants to wear a St. Christopher medal on a chain around his neck, which is in violation of our company policy since we’re a machine shop. He is claiming religious discrimination, and I don’t even think his faith requires him to wear this.

Generally, employers can’t enforce a policy that employees can’t wear articles of religious importance at work.

Safety, Health Concerns

Employers, however, do have rights when safety is at issue. If the religious article/piece of jewelry could become caught in machinery, such as in this case, the employer can enforce its policy—safety issues don’t need to be disregarded just for the sake of accommodation.

Health concerns can occur even if a piece of jewelry drops into chemicals that cause volatile fumes. Of course, the employer must enforce its policy for all jewelry for people working in the shop, not just pieces of religious importance.

Court Rulings

Keep in mind that religious belief has been defined by the U.S. Supreme Court as “a belief that is both ‘religious’ in the employee’s own scheme of things and sincerely held by the employee.”

Therefore, an employer should not question the employee’s belief. Indeed, one case specifically ruled that the employee doesn’t have to show that the issue itself is a “true religious tenet,” but only that the person “sincerely believed it to be religious in her own scheme of things.”

This issue of accommodating religious apparel or insignia has recently been enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in a high-profile case against Abercrombie & Fitch.

That case upheld the right of a practicing Muslim woman to wear a headscarf which didn’t meet the “look” that the company required.

Interactive Process

In most of these cases, exploring alternative solutions is a good idea. The request for a religious accommodation can trigger the “interactive process,” wherein the employer and employee discuss possible ways to honor the employee’s requests.

Sometimes if management is informed of the request and gets more information, options might appear that weren’t considered earlier in the process.

This is an expanding area of the law, as more individuals are involved with religions that have stricter requirements than previously. Before denying any religious accommodation, try engaging in the interactive process noted above, and if that’s not successful, it’s recommended to seek legal counsel.

The Labor Law Helpline is a service to California Chamber of Commerce preferred and executive members. For expert explanations of labor laws and Cal/OSHA regulations, not legal counsel for specific situations, call (800) 348-2262 or submit your question at

Staff Contact: Dana Leisinger

Dana Leisinger
Dana Leisinger
Dana Leisinger joined the CalChamber in 2000 and currently serves as an HR adviser. She has advised employers on matters such as employment law, wrongful termination, discrimination, sexual harassment and wage and hour issues. She also has conducted seminars and training and guided employers through various levels of governmental investigations. Leisinger holds a J.D. from the McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific.

Related Articles

Moonlighting OK, But Not Job Performance/Attendance Issues

Can California employers require employees to submit written notification/disclosure that they have a second job? California is very protective of employees who engage in “lawful conduct,” and it is illegal to discriminate against employees or...

Panelists Share Insights on Fostering Diversity, Inclusion; Video Available

Fostering diversity and inclusion in the workforce requires strong intention and difficult conversations, Audra Bohannon, senior client partner at Korn Ferry, advises in a recent recorded panel discussion released by the California Chamber of...

U.S. Supreme Court Extends Sexual Orientation, Transgender Protections

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling on whether a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity fall within Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s sex discrimination protections. The Supreme...