Cost Cutter Regulatory Reform Bill Clears First Committee Hurdle

State agencies will be required to consider the fiscal impacts of regulatory proposals on the cost of living before moving them forward if a California Chamber of Commerce-supported bill becomes law.

The Cost Cutter bill, AB 2366 (Ávila Farías; D-Martinez), this week passed the first committee to consider the legislation.

AB 2366 requires state agencies as well as the Legislative Analyst’s Office to evaluate regulations to determine their fiscal impact on cost of living in California, ensuring affordability is a consideration when the state is evaluating proposed new regulations.

Californians have made clear that affordability is top of mind due to the high cost of living in the state, CalChamber noted in a letter to the committee.

It therefore is important that the impact of proposed regulations on people’s pocketbooks is taken into consideration when new rules are being considered, CalChamber stated.

For example, the agency should analyze whether regulations may increase the cost of goods and services or deter job growth in California and the resulting impact on consumers.

The Assembly Economic Development, Growth and Household Impact Committee passed AB 2366 by a vote of 7-0 on April 14:

Ayes: Castillo (R-Corona), Patel (D-San Diego), Petrie-Norris (D-Irvine), Michelle Rodriguez (D-Pomona), Solache (D-Lakewood), Soria (D-Merced), Wallis (R-Bermuda Dunes).

No vote recorded: Muratsuchi (D-Torrance).

The bill will be considered next by the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

Andrea Lynch
Andrea Lynch
Andrea N. Lynch joined the California Chamber of Commerce in February 2026 to lead the organization’s advocacy on labor and employment and workers’ compensation issues. Most recently, Lynch was an attorney at Martenson, Hasbrouck & Simon LLP. Her practice areas included workplace solutions, employment litigation, and the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), as well as Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility, labor law, compliance, workplace training, workplace investigations, affirmative action, and employment contracts. Before joining the law firm, Lynch built a career in human resources. For more than a decade, she filled roles such as HR administrator, HR chief and HR consultant for several State of California agencies and other government entities. Lynch holds a B.A. from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where she was on the Dean’s Honor List; an M.A. from the University of the Pacific, magna cum laude; and a J.D. from Lincoln Law School of Sacramento. See full bio

Related Articles

Budget Writers: AB 1776 Will Worsen State Deficit

Two new estimates — including one from the California Department of Finance — affirm what experts have been saying for months: legislation to rewrite the state’s robust antitrust law would wreak havoc on the...

Chamber Urges Committee: Reject Risky Antitrust Plan

The California Chamber of Commerce, along with a large and diverse coalition representing key parts of the state’s economy, is urging the state Senate Appropriations Committee to reject one of the year’s most costly...

Setting the Record Straight on AB 2564: Myths vs. Facts

As California’s legislative session nears its conclusion at the end of the month, CalChamber continues to oppose AB 2564 (Ward; D-San Diego), a bill identified as a Cost Driver because it would significantly increase...