Bill Undermining PAGA Reform Passes Senate Committee

Legislation opposed by the California Chamber of Commerce and a large coalition as a Cost Driver that undermines a painstaking negotiation by business and labor to reach a historic agreement to reform the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) passed the Senate Judiciary Committee this week.

SB 310 (Wiener; D-San Francisco) creates a new private right of action for wage and hour penalties that will be manipulated by trial attorneys, undermining the 2024 PAGA reform, which sought to reduce avenues for litigation abuse and overall costs on employers.

The bill gifts trial attorneys a new means of leveraging wage and hour cases against employers of every size for high settlements, the CalChamber-led coalition pointed out in a letter to committee members.

Coalition Opposition

The coalition opposing SB 310 includes the California New Car Dealers Association, California Restaurant Association, California Retailers Association, Western Growers Association, plus numerous other employer groups and local chambers of commerce.

Under current law, Labor Code section 210 penalties for violations of multiple Labor Code provisions may be collected through PAGA or if the employee files a wage claim with the Labor Commissioner.

When drafting the PAGA reform and the provisions imposing penalty caps when an employer “takes all reasonable steps” to comply with the law and to fix policies and practices, reform advocates made sure the caps applied where a lawsuit seeks Labor Code section 210 penalties through PAGA.

New Reason to Sue

SB 310, however, removes those guardrails from Labor Code section 210, giving it a new, separate private right of action that trial lawyers will attach to every boilerplate claim they file to inflate settlement costs.

As an example of how law firms abuse litigation, in February, the Labor and Workforce Development Agency required one law firm to refile more than 130 PAGA cases. If passed, SB 310 hands such firms a new procedural tool for extracting higher penalties from employers.

Key Vote

SB 310 passed Senate Judiciary on April 22, 10-2.

Ayes: Allen (D-Santa Monica), Arreguín (D-Berkeley), Ashby (D-Sacramento), Durazo (D-Los Angeles), Laird (D-Santa Cruz), Stern (D-Los Angeles), Umberg (D-Santa Ana), Wahab (D-Hayward), Weber Pierson (D-San Diego), Wiener (D-San Francisco).

Noes: Niello (R-Fair Oaks), Valladares (R-Santa Clarita).

Not voting: Caballero (D-Merced).

SB 310 will be considered next by the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Staff Contact: Ashley Hoffman

Previous articleLengthy Restroom Use? Reasonable Accommodation May Be Needed
Next articleCost Cutter Energy Bill Clears First Committee
Ashley Hoffman joined the CalChamber in August 2020 as a policy advocate specializing in labor and employment and workers’ compensation issues. She was named a senior policy advocate starting January 1, 2024 in recognition of her efforts on behalf of members. Before joining the CalChamber, she was an associate attorney in the Sacramento office of Jackson Lewis P.C., representing employers in civil litigation and administrative matters, as well as advising employers on best practices, including compliance with labor laws. She previously worked as a litigation associate and a summer associate at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles. She also was a law clerk at the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee in Memphis and a judicial extern for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Pasadena. Hoffman holds a B.A. with high honors in political science from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and earned her J.D. from the UCLA School of Law, where she was a Michael T. Masin scholar, an editor at the UCLA Law Review, and staff member for the Women’s Law Journal. See full bio