Unemployment Fund Insolvency Will Lead to Payroll Tax Increases

With the legislative frenzy complete for the year, Sacramento’s policymakers are turning their eyes toward next year’s budget and their next round of legislative ideas.

For California employers, one of the largest issues that must be addressed is the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund’s (UI Fund) massive debt and the payroll tax increases that are creeping ever closer as a result of that debt.

How We Got Here

When California was shut down to combat COVID-19, employers were forced to shut their doors. Beginning in March 2020, thousands of employers shuttered their businesses because of this state-imposed stay-at-home.

Many of the businesses that did survive had no choice but to lay off large portions of their workforces. This massive group of laid off workers then sought unemployment, which pulled the UI Fund into massive debt.

As of the date of this piece, California sits at just under $20 billion in UI Fund debt to the federal government as a result of this shutdown (see state debt list here). For comparison, that is slightly less than twice as much debt as after the Great Recession.

In addition, subsequent investigation has revealed that somewhere around $1 billion of these UI payments were fraudulent (rough calculations are available in the previous story on this subject, available here).

Unless the state acts, this insolvency will trigger payroll tax increases for California employers starting in 2023. The increases will grow annually and continue until the insolvency is repaid. For the Great Recession, that repayment took just under a decade, and we can expect it to take longer this time around.

In short — California employers were forced to shut down and to lay off employees, and now will be forced to pay increased taxes because they laid off employees during the shutdown. And, as a bonus, the state lost about a billion dollars of UI benefits by failing to identify fraudulent claims, which California employers will also have to repay via increased taxes.

What Is Legislature Doing About It?

In the 2021 May budget revise, the state had an anticipated $75 billion budget windfall—– and the Governor’s May budget revision included $1.1 billion in American Rescue Plan funds for the UI Fund (which would have covered the fraudulent payments the state mistakenly distributed).

The Legislature didn’t like this provision and pushed back with a proposal for smaller payments over time.

Then, in the murky waters of budget negotiations, all proposals for help with the UI Fund were cut — leaving employers holding the bag for both the fraud and the state-mandated shutdown’s consequences.

That is fundamentally unfair. California’s businesses shouldn’t be paying for the cost of a state-mandated shutdown, and certainly shouldn’t be stuck paying increased taxes because a state agency (the much-criticized Employment Development Department) was tricked into sending out $1 billion in fraudulent payments.

Given that the tax increases on employers will begin in 2023, this isn’t something the Legislature can ignore or delay action on in 2022. And, with another expected budget surplus in the coming year, the Legislature will have the means to address this fundamental unfairness to California’s business community.

This article appeared first as a Capitol Insider blog post.

Staff Contact: Robert Moutrie

Previous articleLegislative Roundup: Priority Bills That Were Signed, Vetoed
Next articleTravel Industry Optimistic on Recovery
Robert Moutrie joined the CalChamber in March 2019 as a policy advocate. He was named a senior policy advocate starting January 1, 2024 in recognition of his efforts on behalf of members. He leads CalChamber advocacy on workplace safety, legal reform and protection, tourism, insurance, unemployment insurance, immigration and education. He is CalChamber's expert on the COVID-19 workplace regulation and was closely involved in its drafting and amendments process at Cal/OSHA. Moutrie has represented clients on matters such as consumer fraud litigation, civil rights, employment law claims, tort claims, and other business-related issues in federal and state courts. He previously served as an associate attorney at the Oakland-based firm of Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson. Moutrie earned a B.A. in political science from the University of California, Berkeley, and a J.D. with honors from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. See full bio.