Saturday, November 26, 2022

Author Revives Plan to Impose Retroactive Liability on Product Makers

A California Chamber of Commerce-opposed proposal to create an unprecedented basis for product liability has been revived by the author after the first attempt failed to meet the deadline for passing the house in which it was introduced.

This week, Assemblyman Rob Bonta (D-Oakland) gutted and amended into AB 2136, his bill dealing with a different subject that had already passed the Assembly, his proposal to hold entities 100% liable even if those entities did not make, distribute, or sell a product that caused any injury.

Now AB 2136 is identical to AB 2074 (Bonta; D-Oakland). As amended this week, AB 2136 relieves a plaintiff of having to prove causation (a basic premise of tort liability).

Instead, a plaintiff can establish a prima facie case if the plaintiff proves a “lead paint pigment manufacturer” sold, distributed, or promoted either “the type of lead paint pigment” or “a product containing the type of lead paint pigment” that caused the injury.

In fact, a company whose lead paint or pigment never even made its way into a single can of house paint in California could be held 100% liable to abate lead paint in houses across the state.

Liability under AB 2136 is “joint and several,” meaning an entity that did not manufacture, distribute, sell, market or promote lead paint for use inside a home in California could be 100% liable for all damages in California, even though the entity has no connection to the alleged harm.

The CalChamber is opposing AB 2136 because imposing such liability on entities that are not responsible for the alleged harm—in any context—is unprecedented and thus sets a troubling precedent for all types of consumer products sold in the State of California.

AB 2136 has been referred to the Senate Environmental Quality, Judiciary and Appropriations committees.

Staff Contact: Jennifer Barrera

Jennifer Barrera
Jennifer Barrera
Jennifer Barrera took over as president and CEO of the California Chamber of Commerce on October 1, 2021. She has been part of the CalChamber team since 2010 and stepped into the top position after serving as CalChamber executive vice president, overseeing the development and implementation of policy and strategy for the organization, as well as representing the CalChamber on legal reform issues. Barrera is well-known for her success rate with the CalChamber’s annual list of job killer legislation, efforts to reform the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and leadership working with employers on critical issues, including most recently those arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, she advises the business compliance activities of the CalChamber on interpreting changes in employment law. Barrera earned a B.A. in English from California State University, Bakersfield, and a J.D. with high honors from California Western School of Law. See full bio

Related Articles

Key to Reopening—Liability Protection

As businesses throughout the state start to reopen, there is a looming question as to whether it is safe. Consumers want to resume a back-to-normal lifestyle by visiting their favorite restaurants and stores, but...

Opposition Stops Some Job Killers; Others Amended

Opposition from the California Chamber of Commerce and allied groups has stopped a number of job killer bills in recent weeks while amendments have removed the most onerous aspects of other job killer bills. In...

New Proposition 65 Rules Include Supply Chain Liability

Minimizing liability is quintessential for any prudent business. Liability could mean costly lawsuits, the loss of valuable business opportunities or relationships, large monetary penalties, serious financial or reputational damage, or even product recalls. Under Proposition...