Biometric Timekeeping: Weigh Benefits Against Privacy Considerations

Wilber_barbara_rgbAre there any California laws or regulations that would prohibit using a biometric timekeeping system that uses a thumb print?

There are definitely issues to consider, but as yet California and federal laws have not specifically addressed the different uses of biometric technology.

The science of biometrics makes it possible to identify a person, not only by fingerprints, but by full hand identification, iris, voice, and face identification.

With the development of time clocks that take these measurements, employers have the ability to more closely monitor and secure their property and to obtain accurate time records. This method also reduces the submission of false time records.

Inevitably, questions arise about employee rights and privacy.

California is one of seven states that provides a constitutional right to privacy. In addition, Article 1, Section 1 of the California Constitution provides that: “All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness and privacy.”

Labor Code Section 1051 requires that fingerprints may be kept only for the employer’s own use.

Weigh the benefits of a biometric system against the necessity to develop privacy policies. Further, employees may be reluctant to be measured and identified. Religious discrimination was an issue in at least one case where an employee objected to hand identification.

Before implementing a new system, develop a clear policy, communicate with employees, explain the system, and give them an avenue to submit questions and to opt out on religious or other grounds.

Consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance and to remain up to date on any changes in the laws.


The Labor Law Helpline is a service to California Chamber of Commerce preferred and executive members. For expert explanations of labor laws and Cal/OSHA regulations, not legal counsel for specific situations, call (800) 348-2262 or submit your question at www.hrcalifornia.com.

Staff Contact: Barbara Wilber

Barbara Wilber
Barbara Wilber
Barbara Wilber joined the CalChamber in 2005 and currently serves as a wage and hour expert. She previously served as a deputy labor commissioner and hearing officer with the Labor Commissioner in the California Department of Industrial Relations. Her 24 years of experience includes settlement conferences, wage claim determinations and resolving employee disputes brought to the Office of the Labor Commissioner.​​​​​

Related Articles

CalChamber Disappointed by Privacy Agency’s Automated Decision-Making Technology Rules

The California Chamber of Commerce voiced disappointment last week after the California Privacy Protection Agency approved sweeping regulations covering the use of automated decision-making technology (ADMT). In a statement released July 24, the day the...

New Report: AB 566 Threatens California Economy, Consumers, Small Businesses

A new report by Capitol Matrix Consulting, commissioned by the California Chamber of Commerce, concludes that Assembly Bill 566 (AB 566) poses a significant threat to California’s consumers, small businesses, and the fundamental structure...

What Supervisors Need to Know, Part I: ‘Hard’ Compliance Skills

In Episode 219 of The Workplace podcast, CalChamber Associate General Counsel Matthew Roberts, Senior Employment Law Counsel Erika Barbara and Employment Law Subject Matter Expert Vanessa Greene tackle what is often referred to as...