Business Stops Bill Allowing Private Attorneys Into Tax Enforcement

A broad business coalition had an early victory in the California State Senate on April 23, when the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee voted down SB 799 (Allen; D-Santa Monica).

SB 799 would have allowed the Attorney General (and, in some cases, private attorneys) to step into tax enforcement by filing individual lawsuits where they alleged tax fraud.

Years-Long Battle

The business community has been fighting this legislation for years, voicing strong concerns that allowing anyone besides California’s tax agencies into tax enforcement invites abusive demands and conflicting interpretations of tax obligations.

Attorney General Rob Bonta was the sponsor of the bill — just as his predecessor, Attorney General Xavier Becerra, had supported similar legislation in 2019 and 2020. Notably, Consumer Attorneys of California also supported the bill — which is not surprising, given they would be the private attorneys bringing those cases.

In a lively legislative hearing, both Senate Revenue and Taxation staff’s analysis and Senator Tim Grayson (D-Concord) expressed strong questions about the need for the bill in light of how effective California’s tax agencies are.

Although the proponents asserted that California had a “tax gap” between expected revenues and tax payments, testimony at the hearing clarified that the so-called “tax gap,” to the extent it exists, is caused mostly by non-filers or underpayment from small-time filers — and not the alleged large-scale fraud asserted by the Attorney General’s team.

Business groups also raised concerns that similar legislation, when passed in other states, was prone to abuse or did not appear to significantly change tax collection.

Although the bill was technically granted re-hearing, no hearing dates remain this year — so businesses can celebrate for this year, but will need to stay wary that this bill may return in 2026.

Key Vote

SB 799 failed to pass Senate Revenue and Taxation on a vote of 2-1.

Ayes: Ashby (D-Sacramento), McNerney (D-Pleasanton).

Noes: Valladares (R-Santa Clarita).

Not voting: Grayson (D-Concord), Umberg (D-Santa Ana).

Staff Contact: Robert Moutrie

Robert Moutrie
Robert Moutrie
Robert Moutrie was named vice president for advocacy in October 2025 in recognition of his outstanding work on behalf of California Chamber of Commerce members. Since January 2024, he had been serving as a senior policy advocate. He joined the CalChamber team in March 2019 as a policy advocate. Moutrie leads CalChamber advocacy on workplace safety, legal reform, tourism, insurance, immigration and unemployment insurance. As CalChamber's expert on occupational safety issues, Moutrie also is an expert on Cal/OSHA’s regulatory process, and works closely with Cal/OSHA staff to make California’s regulations more feasible for businesses. He has represented employers’ concerns with Cal/OSHA during the drafting of the state’s emergency and nonemergency wildfire smoke regulations, COVID-19 emergency and nonemergency regulations, and indoor heat regulation. Moutrie earned a B.A. in political science from the University of California, Berkeley, and a J.D. with honors from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. See full bio.

Related Articles

Cost Drivers Held in Assembly Appropriations

A number of bills identified by the California Chamber of Commerce as Cost Drivers that would have made the state less affordable for businesses and consumers failed to move out of the Assembly Appropriations...

Chamber-Opposed Bill Seeks to Harm Int’l Businesses

The California Chamber of Commerce is opposing legislation that will increase taxes for international businesses. AB 1790 by Assemblymember Damon Connolly (D-San Rafael) would eliminate the water’s edge election — an intentional provision of California’s...

CalChamber Board Opposes Proposed Ballot Measures

The California Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors voted formally last week to oppose two proposed ballot measures that would inflict lasting damage on the state’s economy. The Board took action on December 5 to...