U.S. District Court Reaffirms Support for Arbitration Use in Employment

On January 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit made permanent the preliminary injunction it issued last year prohibiting the state from enforcing legislation that sought to ban the use of arbitration in employment.

This year’s ruling in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Bonta ensures that arbitration can continue to be used as an efficient forum in resolving disputes by employees and employers in California.

The CalChamber led a large coalition of employers in challenging AB 51 (Lorena Gonzalez; D-San Diego), which prohibited employers from requiring employees to arbitrate any disputes arising from the employee’s employment.

In the successful lawsuit, the coalition argued that AB 51 conflicted with federal law (the Federal Arbitration Act), and if allowed to remain in effect, would have resulted in more litigation, significant delays in California’s justice system, and increased costs for businesses and workers alike.

Further, as stated in the legislative analysis of AB 51 and in the complaint itself, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that state laws singling out arbitration agreements for disfavored treatment are preempted. This is the primary reason that a predecessor bill to AB 51, AB 3080 (Lorena Gonzalez; D-San Diego), was vetoed by Governor Jerry Brown in 2018.

CalChamber and the employer coalition filed their initial motion to invalidate and stop enforcement of AB 51 on December 6, 2019. On December 30, 2019, Judge Kimberly Mueller issued a preliminary injunction, halting enforcement of AB 51 until the matter could be resolved. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the temporary order on February 15, 2023.

A study comparing employment arbitrations and litigation found that employee-claimants were greater than three times more likely to win in arbitration, more likely to receive high monetary awards in arbitration, and more likely to spend less time in arbitration than in litigation. Maintaining arbitration as a manner to resolve disputes is a benefit to employees and employers.

Staff Contact: Nicole Wasylkiw

Nicole Wasylkiw
Nicole Wasylkiw
Nicole Wasylkiw is CalChamber’s general counsel, providing legal advice and guidance on all legal and nonemployment matters affecting the organization. She joined the CalChamber executive team in November 2022 after more than a decade at Vision Service Plan (VSP). As associate general counsel, the primary business counsel for VSP Retail in 2021–2022, she provided daily business support, guidance and subject matter expertise to manage all legal matters related to the retail arm of the business, e-commerce and post-acquisition merger and acquisition activities. Outside of her career as an attorney, Wasylkiw has been a personal coach and mentor, offering a full suite of personal and career coaching, life skills coaching and mentorship services. Most recently she became a Nationally Certified Professional in Mediation. She holds a B.S. in criminal justice from Sacramento State University, trained in paralegal studies at MTI College, and later earned her J.D. from Lincoln Law School of Sacramento. See full bio

Related Articles

US Court Largely Suspends California’s New Labor Law

On December 26, 2025, a federal court temporarily blocked major provisions of a new California labor law that would have given the California Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) — the state agency within the...

Ninth Circuit Court Pauses Enforcement of Senate Bill 261

This week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided to pause enforcement of Senate Bill 261, a climate disclosure law, while a lawsuit filed by the California Chamber of Commerce and a coalition of...

US Judge Grants Chamber Request to Block SB 399

A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction requested by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Restaurant Association, and the Western Growers Association, to block enforcement of a 2024 state law placing limits...