Saturday, November 26, 2022

Changes Brewing in Safety/Health Rules Due to Conformity Mandate

I hear there is a new law revising what is considered a serious injury and the requirements for complaint investigations. What are the changes?

As you know, California’s occupational safety and health program must be at least as effective as that of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

Legislation signed into law last August revises the Labor Code to be consistent with federal OSHA for injury reporting and complaints, and also makes changes so that other sections are consistent with state law adopted in 2010.

The new law—AB 1805; Committee on Labor and Employment, Chapter 200; Statutes of 2019—revises Labor Code sections 6302(h) and (i) to broaden the scope of injuries considered “serious.”

State occupational safety and health rules (not yet revised—see below) include the definition of “serious injury or illness” in the Director of Industrial Relations regulations—Title 8, Section 330.

Also revised by the new law was Labor Code Section 6309(a), which delineates Cal/OSHA’s mandates and requirements for complaint investigations.

The change in Labor Code Section 6302(h) matches the federal regulation. The changes to Labor Code sections 6302(i) and 6309(a) create consistency with the previously adopted state law (AB 2774; Swanson; D-Alameda; Chapter 692; Statutes of 2010).

‘Serious’ Injuries/Exposure

The revised definition of “serious injury or illness” in Section 6302(h) requires an employer to report all hospitalizations except that for observation or diagnostic testing. (The previous requirement was to report a hospitalization of more than 24 hours.)

The loss of an eye is now a qualifying injury, and “amputation” replaces the term “loss of a body member.”

Injury, illness or death caused by an accident on a public street or highway is exempt unless the accident happens in a construction zone. The reporting exemption/exclusion for incidents related to violations of the Penal Code has been deleted.

In Section 6302(i), “serious exposure” deals with the exposure of an employee to a hazardous substance. The exposure must be reported if there is a “realistic possibility” (formerly “substantial probability”) of death or serious physical harm in the future.

Section 6309(a) also substitutes the term “realistic possibility” for “substantial probability” for evaluating and determining the seriousness and response time of a complaint.

Rulemaking Yet to Begin

Because these legislative mandates were signed into law in August 2019, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) has not had enough time to evaluate and develop rulemaking to be adopted into Title 8 for normal enforcement.

If a serious or unique situation arises, however, Cal/OSHA could write a special order to an employer referencing the applicable Labor Code.

If you are affected by these amendments, it is recommended that you periodically check the Department of Industrial Relations and Cal/OSHA websites to monitor the rulemaking process.


Column based on questions asked by callers on the Labor Law Helpline, a service to California Chamber of Commerce preferred and executive members. For expert explanations of labor laws and Cal/OSHA regulations, not legal counsel for specific situations, call (800) 348-2262 or submit your question at www.hrcalifornia.com.

Staff Contact: Mel Davis

Mel Davis
Mel Davis
Mel Davis joined the CalChamber in 2000 as a Cal/OSHA adviser specializing in Cal/OSHA and safety-related matters. He worked for Cal/OSHA for more than 23 years as a principal safety engineer and construction safety engineer. His responsibilities included managing the technical staff responsible for developing and revising California safety and health regulations, evaluating requests for variances from regulations, and conducting complaint and accident investigations at all types of construction sites.

Related Articles

COVID-19 Regulation: Cal/OSHA Makes Big Changes Ahead of December Vote

California employers may want to get out their measuring tape — because the size (in cubic feet) of a workspace just became an important element of COVID-19 compliance. Last Thursday and Friday (October 13–14), the...

CalChamber Calls for Changes to Nonemergency COVID Draft Rule

The Cal/OSHA Standards Board’s draft proposal to extend the state’s COVID-19 regulation for another two years — with some significant changes from the COVID-19 emergency regulation — still needs adjustments, the California Chamber of...

State Change in COVID-19 Definition of ‘Close Contact’ Leaves Questions for California Employers

One of the most well-known elements of COVID-19 workplace safety was changed last month — to relatively little fanfare — and it has left California employers with many questions. The longstanding definition of a “close...