Job Killer Bill Increases Workers’ Compensation Costs for Hospitals

The California Chamber of Commerce reminded legislators this week that pending job killer legislation will significantly increase workers’ compensation costs for public and private hospitals.

CalChamber-opposed SB 567 (Caballero; D-Salinas) presumes certain diseases and injuries are caused by the workplace and establishes an extremely concerning precedent for expanding presumptions into the private sector. The January 8 amendments fail to address these concerns.

The bill creates a legal presumption that blood-borne infectious diseases, tuberculosis, meningitis, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and musculoskeletal injury are presumptively workplace injuries for all hospital employees who provide direct care.

Workers’ Compensation

Injuries occurring within the course and scope of employment already are covered automatically by workers’ compensation insurance, regardless of fault.

Workers’ compensation insurance is a “no fault” system that is intentionally constructed in a way that leads to the vast majority of claims being accepted.

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board administrative law judge is required to interpret the facts liberally in favor of injured workers when determining compensability, creating few obstacles for employees who believe that they have been injured at work.

Work Causation Presumed

SB 567 mandates that hospital employees do not need to demonstrate work causation for specified injuries or illnesses in any circumstance. Instead, these injuries and illnesses are presumed to be work-related, saddling hospitals with a higher burden of proof when attempting to contest a claim that they believe is nonindustrial.

SB 567 would make it nearly impossible for an employer to contest any claim for benefits, unnecessarily increasing costs for employers.

Moreover, there generally is a one-year statute of limitations for workers’ compensation claims, ensuring that claims will be resolved while evidence and witnesses are still available. Per SB 567, however, a former employee could come back and file a claim based on this presumption for up to 5 years after employment had ended, and the employer would be virtually powerless to question the compensability of the claim.

Job Killer

The CalChamber opposes SB 567 as a job killer because it will create an astronomical financial burden on health care employers and the system, creating an appreciable impact on the cost of health care at a time when the focus is on trying to make health care more affordable.

SB 567 failed passage in the Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee last year, but was granted reconsideration.

Staff Contact: Laura Curtis

Previous articleEmployers/Co-Workers Now May Seek Gun Violence Restraining Order
Next articleFinance Director Outlines Investment Objectives
Laura E. Curtis
Laura E. Curtis joined the CalChamber in December 2017 as a policy advocate. She specializes in labor and employment, workers’ compensation, and regulatory reform issues. Before joining the CalChamber policy team, she was a labor and employment attorney counseling clients on subjects including wage-and-hour disputes, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims, and administrative agency compliance. Curtis holds a B.A. in communications with a minor in political science from the University of California, San Diego. She earned a J.D. from Santa Clara University School of Law, where she worked on the International Law Journal. See full bio.