Coalition Continues Push for Workplace Flexibility

Seeks Support for Ability to Work Independently

As the 2019 legislative session gets underway, a California Chamber of Commerce-led coalition is continuing its efforts to develop a proposal supporting the ability of workers to work independently.

The coalition explains through its website at why state lawmakers need to take action regarding the California Supreme Court ruling that created a one-size-fits-all test for deciding who is an independent contractor (Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903).

With the variety of industries and independent contractors affected, the test used by the court in Dynamex simply does not work.

Impact of Dynamex

California is estimated to have nearly 2 million residents who choose to work as independent contractors. That figure is a conservative one as the 2018 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic Release did not include the number of individuals who supplement their income with online platforms.

Independent contractors work in many industries, including health care, education, financial planning, agriculture, beauty, creative fields (filmmaking, editors, writers), technology development, insurance, construction, on-demand marketplace and transportation.

As many employers know, in April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a significant decision in Dynamex that completely changed the way in which an individual is classified as an independent contractor versus an employee in this state.

The court abandoned a long-established test previously adopted by the court in a 1989 decision. This previous approach weighed multiple factors in their totality to account for the variety of California industries and professions, as well as diversity of California’s workers.

Under Dynamex, the court presumes that a worker is an employee unless the hiring entity establishes all three of this one-size-fits-all test. This test is referred to as the “ABC Test.”

Under the ABC Test, an individual is presumed to be an employee, unless the company can prove all of the following:

A. That the worker is free from control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact; and

B. That the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and

C. That the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business of the same nature as the work performed.

The “ABC Test” has never before existed in California. It is the most restrictive form of the ABC Test, and the Dynamex decision marks the first time in U.S. history that any form of the ABC Test has been imposed by a court without any legislative approval.

For more background information, see the article at

Coalition Activities

Due to the enormous impact of the Dynamex decision, the coalition is rapidly and continuing to grow. The I’m Independent Coalition currently consists of more than 3,000 members, including businesses, independent contractors and industry associations.

The coalition has convened:

• Four separate roundtables across the state during the fall that were attended by nearly 150 independent contractors and small business owners.

• Thirty town hall and coffee meetings with legislators and/or legislative staff members.

• Six in-district meetings with new legislators.

• Sent more than 6,000 emails to legislators urging action.

Get Involved

The coalition and CalChamber will continue to work diligently as the session progresses, seeking legislation that modernizes California’s labor laws in ways that preserve the flexibility independent contractors value while improving the quality and security of independent work.

To get involved, please visit or contact CalChamber directly at (916) 444-6670.

Staff Contact: Laura Curtis

Previous articleMore Questions on Carbon Tax Proposal
Next articleHeat Illness Prevention in Indoor Workplaces
Laura E. Curtis served as a CalChamber policy advocate from December 2017 to March 4, 2020. She specialized in labor and employment, workers’ compensation, and regulatory reform issues. Before joining the CalChamber policy team, she was a labor and employment attorney counseling clients on subjects including wage-and-hour disputes, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims, and administrative agency compliance. Curtis holds a B.A. in communications with a minor in political science from the University of California, San Diego. She earned a J.D. from Santa Clara University School of Law, where she worked on the International Law Journal. See full bio.