Targeted Tax Becomes No. 19 on Job Killer List

JopKillerThe California Chamber of Commerce this week added a targeted tax to its job killer list, bringing the total number of bills on the list to 19.

The latest bill, AB 2782 (Bloom; D-Santa Monica), threatens jobs in the beverage, retail and restaurant industries by arbitrarily and unfairly targeting certain beverages for a new tax in order to fund health programs.

Jobs at Risk

To the extent AB 2782 has its intended effect of reducing consumption, employers engaged in the production, distribution, retail, and restaurant industry will have to mitigate that loss through reduction of costs in other areas, including labor.

The bill seeks to charge a $0.02 excise tax on each fluid ounce of a bottled sweetened beverage and a $0.02 excise tax on each fluid ounce produced from a concentrate from which a sweetened beverage is derived.

Although the bill describes the amounts collected as a “health impact fee,” the revenues are a tax that would be used to fund the Healthy California Fund. That fund provides various departments with the authority to invest in prevention programs and activities to address diabetes, obesity, heart disease, and dental disease.

Significant Consequences

As CalChamber’s opposition letter explains: “imposing a targeted tax on one industry to address a statewide problem that is created due to numerous different issues unrelated to sweetened beverages, will have significant consequences.”

The letter points out that the targeted tax will certainly be passed on to consumers through higher prices.

Another concern is the creation of additional state programs that may ultimately rely on General Fund revenue in order to survive. If, as intended, AB 2782 deters consumers from buying sweetened beverages, the excise tax will be a decreasing revenue source and there could be more pressure to use the General Fund to replace the funding for the programs the bill creates.

The business community consistently maintains that if a tax is necessary, it should be only temporary and broad-based so that the impact is minimized as the tax burden is shared by all instead of an individual business or industry.

Action Needed

AB 2782 awaits action in the Assembly Health Committee. The CalChamber is urging members to contact their Assembly representatives and members of Assembly Health to ask them to oppose AB 2782.

An easy-to-edit sample letter is available at

Staff Contact: Jennifer Barrera

Previous articleCalChamber Identifies 2016 Job Creator Bills
Next article22 CalChamber Members on Fortune List of ‘100 Best Companies to Work For’
Jennifer Barrera took over as president and CEO of the California Chamber of Commerce on October 1, 2021. She has been part of the CalChamber team since 2010 and stepped into the top position after serving as CalChamber executive vice president, overseeing the development and implementation of policy and strategy for the organization, as well as representing the CalChamber on legal reform issues. Barrera is well-known for her success rate with the CalChamber’s annual list of job killer legislation, efforts to reform the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and leadership working with employers on critical issues, including most recently those arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, she advises the business compliance activities of the CalChamber on interpreting changes in employment law. Barrera earned a B.A. in English from California State University, Bakersfield, and a J.D. with high honors from California Western School of Law. See full bio