CalChamber Stops 18 of 19 Job Killer Bills

Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. yesterday vetoed the two California Chamber of Commerce-opposed job killer bills on his desk. In 2015, CalChamber identified 19 job killer bills and stopped 18 of them from becoming law.

On October 11, the last day for the Governor to act on legislation sent to his desk, the Governor vetoed AB 465 (R. Hernández; D-West Covina) which would have increased litigation and SB 406 (Jackson; D-Santa Barbara) that would have significantly expanded the California Family Rights Act.

“We appreciate the Governor’s thoughtful approach and attention to the adverse consequences of overly broad legislation,” said Allan Zaremberg, CalChamber President and CEO. “These vetoes will help establish the certainty that California businesses need in managing their workforce and will be a positive factor in promoting California job creation.”

AB 465, Increased Litigation

CalChamber argued that if signed into law, AB 465 would have worsened the litigation environment and hurt job creation because it precluded mandatory employment arbitration agreements, which is likely pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act.

Governor Brown agreed with CalChamber writing: “California courts have addressed this issue of unfairness by insisting that employment arbitration agreements must include numerous protections to be enforceable, including neutrality of the arbitrator, adequate discovery, no limitation on damages or remedies, and a written decision that permits some judicial review and limitation on the costs of arbitration.”

On the issue of pre-emption, the Governor wrote that “recent decisions by both the California and United States Supreme Courts have found that state policies which unduly impede arbitration are invalid.”

SB 406, Significant Expansion of California Family Rights Act

SB 406 (Jackson; D–Santa Barbara)was identified as a job killer because the bill would have increased costs and the risk of litigation. The bill would have created inconsistencies with federal law by expanding the family members for whom leave may be taken, which would have provided a potential 24-week protected leave of absence for employers to administer.

The Governor agreed with CalChamber’s assessment of the bill, pointing out that the bill … “could require employers to provide employees up to 24 weeks of family leave in a 12 month period.”

The Governor continued that he is “open to legislation to allow workers to take leave for additional family members that does not create this anomaly.”

Job Killer Signed

One job killer bill, AB 359 (Gonzalez; D-San Diego), dealing with grocery workers, was sent to the Governor in August and was signed into law.

CalChamber
CalChamber
The California Chamber of Commerce is the largest, broad-based business advocate to government in California, working at the state and federal levels to influence government actions affecting all California business. As a not-for-profit, we leverage our front-line knowledge of laws and regulations to provide affordable and easy-to-use compliance products and services.

Related Articles

Affordability Agenda: Costly Anti-AI Bills Added to List

Five proposals that would overregulate and possibly ban the use of cost-effective, beneficial artificial intelligence tools by California businesses were added this week to CalChamber’s Affordability Agenda, an annual assessment of legislation that could...

Rate Realities Campaign Urges Legislators to Cut Mandates that Add 37% to Customer Bills

The California Chamber of Commerce this week announced the next phases of the “Rate Realities” campaign, calling on lawmakers to get serious about affordability, cut costly mandates, and stop passing legislation that drives up...

What to Do When Firing an Employee Who Refuses to Come to Office

We have an employee who was suspended pending an investigation, and we plan to terminate him today. We have his final paycheck at the office ready for him to pick up. However, he refuses...