Wednesday, November 30, 2022

CalChamber Welcomes U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Arizona Redistricting Case​​​​​​

The California Chamber of Commerce today applauded the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, et al.

“Today’s decision removed the conflicted legislature from the redistricting process and upheld the will of the people via the initiative process,” said Allan Zaremberg, CalChamber president and CEO. “The ruling affirms California’s commitment to the voters to have competitive congressional districts. Politicians will only win re-election if they have earned the support of voters,” he said.

The CalChamber, former Governors Deukmejian, Wilson, and Schwarzenegger, Charles T. Munger, Jr. and Bill Mundell jointly filed an amicus brief in the case supporting the constitutionality of Arizona citizens’ decision to have congressional voting lines drawn by an independent redistricting commission rather than by legislators. A similar commission was formed by California voters in 2010.

The case heard by the high court involved a constitutional challenge by Arizona state legislators in the wake of a vote by the people of Arizona in 2000 to form the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. Arizona state legislators contended they alone had the authority to determine the lines for congressional election districts and filed a lawsuit challenging formation of the independent commission. The matter was appealed all the way up to the high court. The Arizona case threatened the will of California voters who passed Propositions 11 and 20.

“Today’s decision is good news for California voters who wanted to end the inherent conflict of interest when legislators drew self-serving district boundary lines following each census. The lines drawn by California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission have resulted in the fairest and most competitive elections in California history,” said Zaremberg.

The California Chamber of Commerce is the largest, broad-based business advocate to government in California, working at the state and federal levels to influence government actions affecting all California business. As a not-for-profit, we leverage our front-line knowledge of laws and regulations to provide affordable and easy-to-use compliance products and services.

Related Articles

Ninth Circuit Panel to Rehear Arguments on California’s Mandatory Arbitration Ban

A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel has voted to withdraw its original ruling on California arbitration agreements in employment and rehear arguments on AB 51, leaving the law unresolved. AB 51 prohibited employers from...

U.S. High Court Ruling Supports Arbitration

In a win for California employers, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week that individual claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) can be compelled to arbitration if the employee signed a valid...

Appeals Court Sides with CalChamber in Prop. 65 Ruling on Acrylamide in Food

Last week, California businesses won another victory in the continuing debate over whether the Proposition 65 warning requirement applies to acrylamide in food and beverage products. In a March 17 ruling, the Ninth Circuit U.S....